| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
Feb 16 2007, 01:38 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() PhD in Zagnut Husbandry
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 1,716
Joined: 23-April 05
From: Willimantic, Connecticut
Member No.: 1,144
Persuasion: Naderite |
On Saturday, Feb. 17th, Dennis and Elizabeth Kucinich are visiting Connecticut. After a press conference in Westport, they'll be at the UConn Storrs campus, where I'll have the honor of meeting the Kuciniches and interviewing Dennis live on WHUS, the campus radio station, from 6:00-7:00 p.m. EST. (I've prepared a list of what I hope are intelligent, substantive questions.) Following the interview is an 8:00 meet-and-greet in the Student Union lobby.
If you'd like to catch the interview live, you can log on to the station's webcast at whus.org. Just thought some of y'all might be interested. |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 01:45 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Spiritual Avenger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin
Posts: 3,999,479
Joined: 3-August 06
From: Southern California
Member No.: 1,485
Persuasion: dynamite monkey |
QUOTE(NightTrain @ Feb 15 2007, 05:38 PM) [snapback]274050[/snapback] On Saturday, Feb. 17th, Dennis and Elizabeth Kucinich are visiting Connecticut. After a press conference in Westport, they'll be at the UConn Storrs campus, where I'll have the honor of meeting the Kuciniches and interviewing Dennis live on WHUS, the campus radio station, from 6:00-7:00 p.m. EST. (I've prepared a list of what I hope are intelligent, substantive questions.) Following the interview is an 8:00 meet-and-greet in the Student Union lobby. If you'd like to catch the interview live, you can log on to the station's webcast at whus.org. Just thought some of y'all might be interested. That's awesome! Streaming? Can we call in and embarrass you? -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 01:52 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Spiritual Avenger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin
Posts: 3,999,479
Joined: 3-August 06
From: Southern California
Member No.: 1,485
Persuasion: dynamite monkey |
ps Elizabeth Kucinich: total babe.
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 02:02 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() brass ovaries
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 2,062
Joined: 8-January 04
From: unimportant, all white NH
Member No.: 129
Persuasion: Disrupter |
Excellent, NightTrain! This is very cool.
He's coming to NH on Sunday, and I'll be hanging with him at a forum on single payer health care. -------------------- "When morality comes up against profit, it is seldom profit that loses." ~ Shirley Chisholm
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 02:12 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 10-February 07
Member No.: 1,817
|
I cannot stand Dennis K.
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 03:52 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 39
Joined: 19-January 07
Member No.: 1,788
Persuasion: Liberal |
The most annoying thing about Dennis K. during the pres. primaries of the 2004 election cycle was that I found myself agreeing with about 90% of what I heard him say. And he kept on saying it , and saying it....
He does keep a number of key issues at the forefront of the national debate. |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 06:59 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() PhD in Zagnut Husbandry
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 1,716
Joined: 23-April 05
From: Willimantic, Connecticut
Member No.: 1,144
Persuasion: Naderite |
QUOTE(thehesitator @ Feb 15 2007, 09:12 PM) [snapback]274059[/snapback] I cannot stand Dennis K. Thank you for that intelligent, well-thought-out response. Now GFYS. |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 12:32 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Am Yisrael Chai
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 7,452
Joined: 27-August 04
Member No.: 924
Persuasion: Remnant |
QUOTE(thehesitator @ Feb 15 2007, 09:12 PM) [snapback]274059[/snapback] I cannot stand Dennis K. Because. . .? ![]() Mazel Tov, Dean ![]() I shall try to catch the broadcast. -------------------- The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little
- FDR |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 12:33 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Straight up quiddlebacher hohe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 7,377
Joined: 21-March 04
Member No.: 599
Persuasion: Deanocrat |
QUOTE(NightTrain @ Feb 16 2007, 12:59 AM) [snapback]274073[/snapback] Thank you for that intelligent, well-thought-out response. Now GFYS. Aw, yer such a kindhearted soul. -------------------- ![]() "A politics which is unresponsive to the people is a failed politics, and should be abandoned" - Senator Paul Wellstone |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 04:17 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() The Complete Bastard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin
Posts: 4,112
Joined: 3-August 06
From: Isles of Langerhan
Member No.: 1,484
Persuasion: dynamite monkey |
It's on the P4C calendar.
-------------------- I am the Blue Screen of Death.
|
|
|
|
Feb 17 2007, 04:47 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 10-February 07
Member No.: 1,817
|
Short memory, huh? That little POS aligned himself with the DLC to "kill" Dean in case you forgot. He's another little backstabbing phony who talks big. Wasn't this site a Dean site at some point? Arent' we in Congress because of Dean?
QUOTE(alex @ Feb 16 2007, 04:32 AM) [snapback]274076[/snapback] Because. . .?
![]() Mazel Tov, Dean ![]() I shall try to catch the broadcast. |
|
|
|
Feb 17 2007, 04:49 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Straight up quiddlebacher hohe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 7,377
Joined: 21-March 04
Member No.: 599
Persuasion: Deanocrat |
QUOTE(thehesitator @ Feb 17 2007, 10:47 AM) [snapback]274112[/snapback] Short memory, huh? That little POS aligned himself with the DLC to "kill" Dean in case you forgot. He's another little backstabbing phony who talks big. Wasn't this site a Dean site at some point? Arent' we in Congress because of Dean? Right. DK tossed his support to Kerry during Iowa, then STAYED IN the primaries after Dean got fucked. Woot, DK. -------------------- ![]() "A politics which is unresponsive to the people is a failed politics, and should be abandoned" - Senator Paul Wellstone |
|
|
|
Feb 17 2007, 07:57 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Heading out to the open sea like the great white herring
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 1,804
Joined: 20-February 04
From: Peoples Republic of Travis County
Member No.: 233
Persuasion: Deanocrat |
QUOTE(lojasmo @ Feb 17 2007, 11:49 AM) [snapback]274113[/snapback] Right. DK tossed his support to Kerry during Iowa, then STAYED IN the primaries after Dean got fucked. Woot, DK. Not quite. He worked out a deal with Edwards, not Kerry. Any caucus where either JE or DK might not be viable, the candidate who had more supporters was supposed to get the other's peoples' support. I suspect that the deal worked out in Edwards' favor and contributed to his second place finish. A number of folks (especially Koochniks with stars in their eyes) were shocked to see DK acting like a real-life politician instead of a (non-violent) knight in shining armor. -------------------- Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
|
|
|
|
Feb 17 2007, 10:37 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Spiritual Avenger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin
Posts: 3,999,479
Joined: 3-August 06
From: Southern California
Member No.: 1,485
Persuasion: dynamite monkey |
That doesn't diminish his work , presidential politics were and are pretty -----political.
DK is a great voice to have in congress ps only half an hour to go!! -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2007, 11:29 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Veteran
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 4,184
Joined: 11-December 04
From: Chicago
Member No.: 995
Persuasion: Liberal |
QUOTE(NightTrain @ Feb 15 2007, 07:38 PM) [snapback]274050[/snapback] On Saturday, Feb. 17th, Dennis and Elizabeth Kucinich are visiting Connecticut. After a press conference in Westport, they'll be at the UConn Storrs campus, where I'll have the honor of meeting the Kuciniches and interviewing Dennis live on WHUS, the campus radio station, from 6:00-7:00 p.m. EST. (I've prepared a list of what I hope are intelligent, substantive questions.) Following the interview is an 8:00 meet-and-greet in the Student Union lobby. If you'd like to catch the interview live, you can log on to the station's webcast at whus.org. Just thought some of y'all might be interested. Dennis had the chance of meeting you Dean. Now, that is a good thing :hug: -------------------- |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 03:59 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 39
Joined: 19-January 07
Member No.: 1,788
Persuasion: Liberal |
QUOTE(Capn Sunshine @ Feb 15 2007, 05:52 PM) [snapback]274054[/snapback] ps Elizabeth Kucinich: total babe. ![]() Generally I prefer to address substance rather than image. Aside from not being very tall, (considered by some a drawback), the image projected here is of genuine midwestern decency, intelligence, look-you-in-the eye honesty, and neighborliness. And the obvious affection and respect between the married couple gives them a sort of perpetual newlywed glow--at least in this photo. Family values, folks! With respect to issues around "image," or anything else for that matter, I think that the 'Inside-the-Beltway' crowd and the New England elitists are not in the best position to understand the outlook or needs of people in states with large numbers of rural voters. In the larger cities in places like Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Idaho, and so forth, the rural ethos permeates even the city life and whole community perspective there. These people have a low likelihood of voting for someone from Massachusetts, or New England in general, even if the candidate is mostly OK, because of the perceived intellectualism and elitism. Neither of those are necessarily bad per se, but the implied condescension really irritates a lot of people. If a candidate can show common sense and pragmatism, and be plain-speaking and quite intelligent without conveying that certain nuanced intellectualism, that candidate may have a shot in the national elections. It seems that DK meets and exceeds the standards I describe here. Personally, I don't feel committed yet to any one of the major Dem candidates, but that is because we have about a half dozen pretty good options so far (DK, Obama, Edwards, Hillary, Richardson, and ?). I'm NOT looking for either an impossible perfection or the perfect agreement of a candidate with every one of my beliefs. |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 04:16 AM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Spiritual Avenger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin
Posts: 3,999,479
Joined: 3-August 06
From: Southern California
Member No.: 1,485
Persuasion: dynamite monkey |
QUOTE(Huntinferdata @ Feb 19 2007, 07:59 PM) [snapback]274165[/snapback] With respect to issues around "image," or anything else for that matter, I think that the 'Inside-the-Beltway' crowd and the New England elitists are not in the best position to understand the outlook or needs of people in states with large numbers of rural voters. In the larger cities in places like Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Idaho, and so forth, the rural ethos permeates even the city life and whole community perspective there. These people have a low likelihood of voting for someone from Massachusetts, or New England in general, even if the candidate is mostly OK, because of the perceived intellectualism and elitism. Neither of those are necessarily bad per se, but the implied condescension really irritates a lot of people. If a candidate can show common sense and pragmatism, and be plain-speaking and quite intelligent without conveying that certain nuanced intellectualism, that candidate may have a shot in the national elections. The main problem of course is that ten times as many citizens are urban rather than midwest or rural. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 04:22 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 39
Joined: 19-January 07
Member No.: 1,788
Persuasion: Liberal |
Yes, you have a point, especially if we consider the popular vote. But speaking of numbers, how does that play out in the electoral college system? And, do rural citizens turn out to vote in higher, lower, or about the same percentages as city folk?
Keeping in mind, the people I know from midwestern states or rural towns tend to have strongly held convictions. So does that translate into actually getting out to vote? |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 04:27 AM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() PhD in Zagnut Husbandry
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 1,716
Joined: 23-April 05
From: Willimantic, Connecticut
Member No.: 1,144
Persuasion: Naderite |
QUOTE(Huntinferdata @ Feb 19 2007, 10:59 PM) [snapback]274165[/snapback] I think that the 'Inside-the-Beltway' crowd and the New England elitists are not in the best position to understand [snipped] You know, I'm really sick and tired of hayseeds and rednecks with all their bullshit talk about "New England elitists." That's just code for people who didn't drop out of high school and who read more than just the fucking Bible and the latest waste of paper by O'Reilly and Coulter. I'm a lifelong New Englander and damned proud of it. So FUCK YOU!!! |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 04:28 AM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() PhD in Zagnut Husbandry
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributing member
Posts: 1,716
Joined: 23-April 05
From: Willimantic, Connecticut
Member No.: 1,144
Persuasion: Naderite |
Self-deleted dupe.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| IPB skin developed by: eXtremepixels | ||
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th September 2010 - 07:59 AM | |